"There is one great thing that you men will all be able to say after this war is over and you are home once again. You may be thankful that twenty years from now when you are sitting by the fireplace with your grandson on your knee and he asks you what you did in the great World War II, you won't have to cough, shift him to the other knee and say, "Well, your Granddaddy shoveled shit in Louisiana." No, Sir, you can look him straight in the eye and say, "Son, your Granddaddy rode with the Great Third Army and a Son-of-a-Goddamned-Bitch named Georgie Patton!" - General George S. Patton, Jr.
Ten years from now when South Africa is like Somalia and your grandson asks, "So granddad, what did you do to try and ensure a future for us?" What would you say? Would you able to tell your grandson that you started a blog to inform the world about what was really happening here? That you opened a Twitter account and built a following so as to spread the real news about South Africa under the fascist ANC regime? That you opened a Facebook account where you could share your opinions and actively partake in serious discussions that directly impacted upon our future? Would you be able to tell him that whenever Steve Hofmeyr, Sunette Bridges, Afriforum, Dan Roodt or others arranged a march, that you were there to support their efforts every time? Or...
Would you be telling your grandson that you were one of those who "shoveled shit" by causing dissension in our ranks? Would you be telling your grandson that you were one of those who insulted those activists, spreading unfounded rumours about them, calling them names and telling everyone they were only in it for the money? That you were one of those who always walked with the Bible under your arm insulting and judging everyone for not spelling the name of the Lord the way you wanted them to and for holding the Sabbath on Sundays, rather than Saturdays, while the rest were trying to find common cause for unity? That you were one of those who were more interested in the Illuminati, the Zionists and NWO than getting involved in addressing the real visible, direct threat? That you were one of those still fighting the Anglo-Boer war, while our people were being killed like flies in the here and the now? And that you were one of those who believed that only white, Afrikaans speaking, Christians of your church, or only English speaking descendants of the 1820 Settlers mattered? That you were one of those who split the whites between Boers, Afrikaners and others? That you were one of those stubborn hard-assed fools waving the Nazi flag to demonstrate your supremacy and superiority? That you were one of those who would not associate with Afrikaans speaking whites, because you viewed them as racist, uncivilised hooligans? That you were one of those who, while everyone was fighting for survival, were watching sport on DSTV? That stopped buying newspapers, but refused to cancel DSTV, because sport was your god, more important than your country and the future of your grand-children? That you were one of those that voted for the anti-white DA...
Some 23-million people were registered for the 2009 general elections, which was about 2.5 million more than in 2004. About 76% of registered voters took part in the 2009 election. The white vote is getting less and less important the bigger scheme of things. The 2014 elections will probably see another 3 million, or more, voters registered. This means that while white voters remain stagnant or decreasing, black voter numbers will continue to grow as they age.
While we often hear people wanting to vote for the DA in the hope that the DA would split the vote, one has to wonder what the reasoning is. The DA supports racist anti-white Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) that is nothing other than Black Elite Enrichment by stealing from whites and giving to blacks. A party that supports racist anti-white Affirmative Action (AA) policies, racist Land Redistribution all aimed at ensuring an impoverished, dispossessed white minority.
The DA is leftist liberal party that supports virtually everything else the fascist ANC stands for. The DA's policies are nothing other than adaptations of the ANC's policies. The DA, an acronym for Denialist Appeasers, have been denying the anti-white racism, denying the murdering and slaughtering of whites in this country, the farm attacks and even the existence of white squatter camps. The DA has openly distanced themselves from the whites, coloureds and Indians - the minorities. They have openly declared that they would not support minority rights or minority concerns. They are for the majority, the black majority, and screw the rest.
The DA is well aware that the minority vote will not win them any elections. They are also aware that fighting for the rights of minorities will not gain them any favours with the black majority. While they gained their strength from the merger with the NNP, they've reached a ceiling. Realising they had scored the white vote, they then set their targets at the coloureds and Indians. The only way for the DA to now grow further is by gaining the black vote.
The DA has always denied serious issues important to minorities. While the DA support minority rights in other country, minorities in those countries being black, they've been denying minority rights in South Africa, because here the minorities are not black. DA is a black party, doing everything in their power to buy their vote by appeasing the black majority. They've been appeasing the blacks with promises of doing what the ANC failed to achieve.
The DA, ANC, PAC and most other opposition parties are still fighting apartheid. Helen Zille was a leading Black Sash anti-apartheid activist back then and she still is nothing other than an anti-apartheid activist now. All she did was exchange her Black Sash hat for a DA hat. BEE, AA, land distribution, etc. are all aimed at fighting apartheid. They have no plans for building more cakes, growing the economy, building and developing the country, because they are stuck in a time warp still fighting apartheid with ridiculous anti-white reverse-apartheid policies.
The DA is a black party and "Black South Africans are slowly beginning to identify with a party that is beginning to look like them as black leaders". Numerous ANC members have crossed the floor to the DA. Their white leadership will eventually all be replaced by blacks. Blacks are black and blacks are for blacks only and think only about blacks. The DA is nothing other the ANC and if the DA should show strength, we shall see more ANC members crossing the floor to them. We shall also see more COPE (ex-ANC) crossing the floor to the DA. Where would this leave the whites in this country? Voting for the DA means voting to get rid of the whites in parliament.
Are we going to vote YES again?
6 September 1989 House of Assembly (General) ElectionNational Party (NP): 48.19%Conservative Party (CP): 31.52%Democratic Party (DP): 20.00%
NP 48.19%+DP 20%=68.19%
17 March 1992 ReferendumYES vote: 68.73%No vote: 31.27%It would seem that the NP and DP voters were the ones that voted YES, not realising they were voting for murder, rape, drugs, BEE, AA, nationalisation and land grabs.
Are we going to vote YES again? A vote for the DA is a YES vote showing support for BEE, AA, land distribution, losing property ownership rights and everything else the ANC stands for. The DA is doing everything in their power to win the black vote and once they've obtained it they would need to retain it somehow. The only way to retain it would be to do what the ANC has been doing... "A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw
What the ANC had failed to rob from whites, the DA promises to do when they get to the top.
So what should whites be voting for?
Whites should vote for representation in Parliament.
It makes no sense for whites voting DA "just to break the ANC's two-thirds majority". Even with all whites voting for the DA it would not even make a dent in the ANC vote. The ANC did not gain support, they've lost voter support since 1994. The DA is hoping to gain what the ANC had lost. The whites voting for the DA would make only a minuscule difference to the final ANC count. Only blacks could break the ANC's two-thirds majority by voting DA and that is what the DA is after. They're not even interested in the white minority vote, because they know it would not help them in the least.
No one is going to fight for the rights of whites in this country if we do not do so ourselves. The DA most certainly would not be seen fighting for the rights of whites in any way whatsoever, as it would tarnish their image among their primary target group, the black voters.
Being less than 9% of the population. there is no way the whites could ever win an election to regain power. Voting for the strongest opposition party would mean nothing, because whites would still not enjoy any measure of representation in parliament.
It is strange how whites would consider voting for the DA in spite of the fact that the DA is a black anti-white party, based solely on the premise of breaking the ANC's two-thirds majority, but at the same time they would not vote for the Freedom Front, a white, pro-white party?
Whites would also much rather vote for COPE or the IFP, both black parties, rather than for the Freedom Front?
We see more and more new parties being formed and whites would rather self-destruct by voting for such new parties, all of which are still aspiring to hopefully one day getting a seat in parliament, while not being willing to vote for the Freedom Front, which already is in parliament.
Am I a member of the FF? No, I am not and I belong to no party. Do I agree with everything the FF does or stands for? No, I do not, but I've always voted for them. So why am I canvassing for the Freedom Front?
One thing I know is that with the FF being in parliament it means that whites still have some input in parliament, unless in 2014 whites finally commit political suicide by voting for the anti-white leftist liberal Black Sash led DA.
Once the FF collapses and loses its seats in parliament whites will never get another seat, another voice, another party representing the white population in the SA parliament ever again.
Once that happens, we all might as well leave South Africa sooner rather than later. The fight would be over.
We all know the FF is not the most perfect party and we all know they may have painted themselves into a corner when Dr. Pieter Mulder accepted the deputy Minister of Agriculture position, but who else would or could still get into parliament once that last white party is out?
One thing that is certain, is that the Freedom Front is a better choice for whites than the leftist-liberal, anti-white DA.
Whites should vote to retain some kind of input in parliament. So why not join the FF and make it our own, become actively involved and change it to ensure that it becomes what we want it to be?
Why form more and more new parties, hoping to get a seat in parliament, but in the meantime splitting the vote and killing the only remaining white party that already is in parliament?
In the 1989 general election the Conservative party (CP) obtained 680,131 votes. The National Party received 1,039,704 votes and the HNP only 5,416 votes. 2,804,947 people voted in the 1992 referendum, 875,619 of which voted NO.
By the 1994 elections the Freedom Front received only 424,555.
In 2009 only 146,796 - 0.83% voted for the Freedom Front, the only remaining white party in parliament that will probably not enjoy much support next time around either, because whites would rather lose white representation in parliament than vote for a party that is not racist enough or that is seemingly too racist. However they would much rather vote for an anti-white party, like the DA, that would like to see whites disappearing from this continent and that wants to disenfranchise and dispossess whites completely.
What happened to the 680,131 that voted for the CP in 1989, the 875,619 that voted NO in the 1992 referendum and the 424,555 that voted for the FF in 1994? The Freedom Front dropped from nine seats in 1994 to only three in 1999 and four since 2004. What chance does any other newly formed white party have of gaining even a single seat in parliament if this is the best the FF could achieve?
Forming new parties in the hope of getting a mandate by killing the only existing mandate we have? Totally and completely unknown parties being formed, splitting the few white votes among 20 different new parties, each unable to get enough votes to get a single seat in parliament, while at the same time killing the last remaining white voice in parliament? Is that rational?
Success is determined not by what you're hoping to achieve, but by what you are able to achieve with what you already have. If a business is failing one considers the changes in the market and the business environment, changes the company structure, diversifies and changes marketing strategies, or continue as is until finally going bankrupt.
Whites have to vote to retain representation in Parliament and that means choosing a party and uniting behind that party, not forming a thousand other new little parties that would split and destroy what we have. AND it certainly does not mean voting for the Black Sash / DA!
The Freedom Front has made many mistakes. It has become the party of the farmers, rather than the party representing the white voice in South Africa, but that can only change by getting involved and making it our own.
Are we one day going to tell out grand children that we voted for the anti-white leftist liberal denialist appeasers, the DA, because we wanted to break the ANC's majority with our one cent's worth and by so doing killing the last remaining chance of having a voice in parliament?
Are we going to tell our grand children that we refused to vote for the last remaining white party in parliament and chose to kill it, because we did not like the leaders of that party and were unwilling to get involved in it to make the changes we felt necessary?
Are we going to tell our grand children that we formed twenty new little parties, hoping to get a mandate for whatever reasons, while destroying the last EXISTING mandate we had in parliament?
If a million whites were to vote for the FF we could determine the party's direction, we could then determine our own mandate and force the party to drive that mandate, but if we were to kill it, we might as well leave this continent.
Whites have to start voting with their brains rather than their hearts and their egos. If whites wish to survive in this country we need to show some unity and make sure that we retain a voice, as strong a voice as possible, in parliament.
Why you don’t have to vote for the DA (Democratic Alliance): Part 1
DA in black and white: Mabine Seabe
Voter turnout key to South Africa’s 2009 elections
Elections in South Africa - 1910 - 2009
Research and Policy Brief: South Africa after the ANC - 2nd July 2012.
The future of youth participation in elections
Local Elections in South Africa: Parties, People, Politics